Lighthouse templates checked
No blocking automated issue found
All 10 representative templates returned no failed Lighthouse accessibility audit on 6 September 2026; the structural suite also passed on 625 canonical pages.
Accessibility status
Accessibility, measured and improved continuously.
OnSubmit targets WCAG 2.2 level AA and combines automated checks with keyboard, responsive and theme reviews.
10 representative templates checkedEvery canonical page structurally checkedLight and dark themes reviewed
Current level
A strong automated baseline, published with its limits
The current audit found no blocking automated accessibility error on the representative page templates.
10Lighthouse templates checked
Conformance target
WCAG 2.2 AA
WCAG 2.2 level AA. This is a continuous target, not a third-party certification.
Manual review
No blocking issue found
Last manual review: 29 August 2026. It covered keyboard navigation, focus, reflow at 320 px, light and dark themes, reduced motion and forced colors across 9 representative pages and 11 critical journeys.
Audit scope
What is checked
The review covers shared foundations and the interfaces most likely to expose accessibility regressions.
Document structure
Language, landmarks, one main heading, heading order, unique identifiers, image alternatives and valid ARIA references.
Keyboard operation
Skip link, visible focus, logical tab order, control names and focus restoration after dynamic updates.
Visual accessibility
Text and interface contrast, 44 px shared controls, responsive layouts, light and dark themes, and reduced-motion preferences.
Representative journeys
Home, catalogue, standard and complex tools, file tools, clocks, markets, time zones, contact and guides.
Transparency
What these checks do not prove
Automated tools catch many regressions, but no automated or sampled review can establish complete accessibility on its own.
Not a certification
The published results describe a dated sample, not a claim of complete WCAG conformance.
Real use still matters
Assistive technologies, zoom, language, cognition and individual motor needs require continued human testing and feedback.
A living interface
New tools and content are added regularly, so shared checks run again before each release and focused reviews continue.
Feedback
Found an accessibility barrier?
Tell us which page, control or task caused difficulty. A precise report helps us reproduce and correct it quickly.